Beliefs, national as well as upstart

2008-07-24

Open a National Geographic magazine in a month, I was shocked: red layout, the middle of a dragon, dragon belly a large print: China. This is special. China in recent years was very pushy, whether economic, military, environmental, political, and frequently the international stage debut in Great Power. Recently, China is not. From the beginning a high profile to promote Beijing to host the most successful Olympics to Darfur issue last year due to a boycott activities, and then to 3.10 this year to now, almost every day in the international arena at the cusp.

Objectively speaking, the Western world's fear is understandable. An early age to accept their assistance to the children, now grown up and even started to share the world, how terrible. . . As a result, Western countries began wantonly to China they hate, or even disinformation slander, the purpose is to let the people of these countries realize that a growing country is often gray ash often terrifying. They are successful, they are also beyond reproach. Countries are in the struggle for their own interests, why only allows us to receive long-term "vigilance peaceful evolution wary of capitalism" education, but does not allow the opposing party "patriotic education" for their citizens? Very fair.

Long-term confrontation is bound to inspire a number of contradictions. Tibet should be the success stories of the Western camp dug the corner of "socialism". These temporary not mention, because the error is not all in the West, our government policy on Tibet, Is not it? Does not depend on the cohesion of the nation but by the political unity and a strong rule (or) the country will eventually be abused and lead to pound into the interior. According to Rousseau, if a government can not substitute for the general will, it is clear that this government will be overthrown, not to mention those eyeing the wild beasts. I have not been to Tibet, I have limited knowledge of it. I believe a lot of positive anti-Tibetan separatist me, and even the history and culture of Tibet do not understand, on a grand scale to maintain national unity to safeguard national unity, it is ironic? "Patriotism is the fig leaf" of the rogue, who prove that Rousseau said that's wrong? So I can not from a minority point of view (otherwise I have to become a Tibetan separatist) in Tibet, only from the perspective of the Government to consider: Tibet had to belong to China.

China is a large Han itself, hidden national consciousness after the great national unity has never been just around the corner, or else the so-called United Front Work Department that nothing can be made. End of the World of the friends of a thought-provoking questions: "Ancient farmers almost picked up a kitchen knife just like military weapons, but the ancient dynasty can continue for hundreds of years been the rebel army to overthrow; and now our government was set up only half more than a century, there have been the people picked up a kitchen knife with against the heavily armed government. "historians, political scientists continue to feudal society is inferior to the modern social system, not to mention human rights than the United States five times better Kiribati a. Indeed, feudal monarchy is not comparable to perfect the socialist drops. . . Ancient monarchy commendable, although both rely on the strength of the people to rule, the kings with the divine right of kings, "Let the people who believe in their obedience to their (rather than resorting to violence), and thus the entire Chinese nation is united with forming a general will. Openness and globalization of modern society, such as "Emperor" lies nowhere to hide, coupled with economic development so that the people slack, no one actively engaged in public career, because everyone is busy "muffled fortune" go, therefore, a belief of the Chinese nation lost money.

China does not like this nation of immigrants in Canada and USA can accept multiculturalism. In general, many people in the country the more difficult the rule, because the voice of the people is too many and too complex, too difficult to reconcile. But the most important of these two immigrant countries is a common belief: the guide to action is the Bible. After all, the land of Han since civilization found entrenched in the ancient land of China, unlike North America this was the white men with guns massacre forced to snatch down: Early North America is a group to get rid of the shackles of the old Europe came to the New World to realize their The dream of the crowd, they have a common goal, but the Chinese nation is a combination of more like a tradition, thousands of years of battle so that people generally felt that such ethnic combination is not controversial. Such a combined form is fragile, if there is external pressure has sparked doubts about the ethnic separatist sentiment will spread. We are the Government's early establishment of the presence of Chairman Mao should be said that this ties that bind can be strengthened, but later. . . We all know that. . . Other than in my memory, my educated in addition to size-fits-emphasized "national unity", "The Chinese nation is composed of 56 ethnic groups, as well as the name of these peoples, I never knew the text, culture, religion, etc. These are the most fundamental thing to a national existence. Therefore, the ideological control of the United Front Work Department of the door is difficult to truly guarantee minority unity, YY, no problem.

---

I think the most incredible is that most of their peers for the government and the current social attitude: does not matter (everywhere in soy sauce M). The so-called Communist Party members (the largest members of the sect of the legendary Chinese mainland), simply forget their university pledged to maintain its advanced nature (although everyone knows they are nothing more than the title of that party members for their own future "development") turn a blind eye to the danger now organized, always one: none of my business. The so-called non-party member, when in school political enthusiasm, anxious to go every day, demonstrations, encountered disappointments Mama Government also considered the solution of the mouth stuffiness, their daily crowded bus crowded subway cautious and conscientious for their own future, work after the home is a study of stock prices hotties, bullfighting seems to be castrated, and even the last point of Ah Q spirit disappeared. . .

Yes, the economic base determines the superstructure: When you every day for basic basic necessities of life on the run, how could it have the time and effort to view the behavior of the superior bureaucrats? Even if you dare to order what speech on the network, you also worried about being invited to tea, then why do you do these "dog in the manger" thing? Heavens to fix it by the Government itself - everyone knows, the real monsters of this film days really have to let our own people, grass-roots are carrying, to repair. Because, it is our own choice of government, our own form of government is what we own connivance of the government, finally our own subversion of the government. Wait until the demise of the government, government officials will become of us ordinary one. Yes, the error is not the government is the people, is our own. Therefore, we are led to the disaster finally have to bear the consequences.

Government has never been naturally occurring. Its officials are elected (at least nominally). Even if officials is not selected, we can not escape from the stakeholders. Since not satisfied with this instead of us to exercise their rights, then we determined not to allow him to board this seat: Unfortunately, most people are because of fear of reprisal or view of human relationships and so choose to endure or concessions. In fact, such as a village, if there are more than half of the ordinary villagers to rise up against the village head instead of the exercise of their rights, the government would compromise, but have different degrees of compromise. Because any regime, it is the people's regime, the people, the regime does not exist. Some people will say: The Government will let us use violence to yield! In the final analysis, because from the beginning do not believe the government is to replace the exercise of their rights, but that the government is our master. In my opinion, relying on the government of the rule of brute force to remove the tyrant government, only two kinds: either the interim government, or just rely on the successful usurper of riots is one of the early people choose but left to its lead to the imminent demise of the government. The former requires violence to maintain just captured to the regime, which requires violence to delay its life. So, until the violence has been the government free use, we say that such a remedial measure. Therefore, the importance of early awakening, people can grasp the development trend of the government, and to determine how to improved government. Anyway, that mistakes be attributed to our generation to go? ? ?

89 years of the movement is not so much movement, as it is a rally in disguise. Perhaps the people of that time has finally come to realize: country of origin of all their own. Assembly, but the most fundamental representation of the declaration of this consciousness, and is the most appropriate and most reasonable way. Unfortunately, such as Rousseau, democracy, and not all of the nation can always match. The 89-year storm is actually the people at that time, or, led by college students, too early to estimate the maturity of the political system. Even when the movement is successful, the help of external forces, the government was very difficult to achieve democracy. However, once outside help, the rights of the entire nation is actually integrated into the rights of the external formation of the Government is not our nation's own government. So, from this perspective, the failure of the movement is inevitable and beneficial to us.

So I think that our democracy is the same as unattainable in the near future. Our civilization has been too perfect, the personality of the whole nation in the history of mankind basically not been changed. Said the ugly, feudal society for thousands of years left in our bones the servility of our nation, most prolific in fertile plains and mountainous such as rivers and lakes to grow and develop national, comfortable, no sense of crisis. Thus, food and clothing to meet the basic needs of life, the lifeblood of the continuation of human enough. As to be king and his royal rule, it did not, since we feed it. According to Machiavelli, the king under the rule of the people as long as has not been deprived of their property and family, they will choose to accept this rule. National development from the remote and barren alpine desert grasslands and other places, however, more than the nation in the Mainland with some sense of crisis, because at least their material life is not stable and continuous, their natural needs are more urgent, so this The nation has more or less a trace of awareness of the struggle. Of course, this is only the most simple analysis, the formation of the nation is only part of their specific environment, geography and climate factors. I want to say is: our entire Chinese nation in terms of democracy in the Western sense is not likely. Democracy requires at least the consciousness of the people to achieve a certain degree. Our society, now part of every day, clamoring for democracy and freedom, some people act as a defender of every day to maintain the current system, more people opted for silence. Therefore, unless our educational system can help us to change the thinking of a generation, it would be difficult to achieve what we want or close to the kind of democratic society that we want. (Of course, the Western-style democracy is not true democracy, but they sum up and improved a system, we also entirely possible to figure out a more democratic system for the vast territory of many people of the country. )

The current crop of social discontent, hostility everywhere, whether poor or rich, in fact, like a taut string, explosive. The worst results appeared, that is, small-scale disturbances caused by large-scale unrest, eventually leading to the emergence of anarchy. For China, this is a sign under under under under the sign. The end of the current people's long-term suppression of the clamp, a variety of actions that may arise, in particular, coupled with our national characteristics and long-term accumulation of region, class contradictions, for a long period of time can not expect the emergence of a new government.

-

Our nation since ancient times is a good face vanity nation, so achievements can not wait all over the world clamored. The expense of environmental pollution, cultural decay, and so on in exchange for rapid economic growth is a hundred and seventy years since the Opium War of China's most any decent work. Economic miracle, the top crown is perhaps the thorny crown, but it is quite exciting for our people: our socialist economic construction is certainly better than the imperialist capitalist ~ ~ ~ F, is getting higher and higher. skyscrapers in the United States as early as thing of the past; our railways are getting longer and longer, are on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; our foreign exchange reserves, more and more that the Yankees owe us a bunch of debt; our students to study where there was the Chinese students; our quality is getting higher and higher, the number of Internet users, but first in the world; our people are getting richer, Paris, New York is full of Chinese tourists generous consumption; more and more working women open in North America with the "milk Village mistress Tuen; our social harmony, where people are jubilant praises. I do not want to evaluate the impact of these phenomena, I just want to see the future of our society.

See around us, upstart? In our society, the money to the freedom of others killed in the cave, the rich could bribe lawsuit disregard for human life and money to driving a BMW hit migrant workers and then wants to play hit scold scolded, the money can be womanizing. . . The rich are allowed to exist, should exist, because each individual is different, certain people than others certainly easier to play in order to acquire wealth. However, when a society allows people to social systems defects for profit rather than unchecked, when a society allows the freedom of man as the items for sale, when the social default behavior of the basic moral challenge of human society and authority but choose to avoid or ignored, it has been terminally ill. Human freedom. Even if we can not protect their own freedom, and then consideration is not on the government to contain enough when it was too late.

The law can not be guaranteed for all. Even in the most democratic legal system and most robust country, their law is not able to cover the human society, their members of all social behavior. The only morality is eternal. Therefore, the ancient sages, the West or the East have agreed that mankind should continue to develop their own virtue, the only virtue is to ensure the healthy development of the cornerstone of human society. Of course, the high expectations and did not give the people a lot of influence, because the sages say on behalf of a natural person, only their right to the implementing agencies: the Government respected the people's will change. Chinese feudal monarchs in a variety of philosophical theories pick to pick went to the reason: they want to find the one best able to protect the rule of the theory, that is, the people become more obedient duller. Led to a school of Confucius and Mencius philosophy has become the source of our spirit: filial piety running the country, only loyalty to the emperor; Heaven, only scepter. . . These doctrines at the same time help the monarch to consolidate his rule, but also the people in the subtle change their concepts, to enhance their moral cultivation, so will be of the ancient "Lubushiyi night close the doors" of feudal rule. Whenever the people free country in the world today, the moral of the people must be noble. Rely on external forces to imitate to the so-called democratic countries like India that is a counter-example: the people's moral standards in the heart of downtown defecation whether there will be tall? So I do not think that the real India of such a system to achieve universal freedom.

Before I consider that our country is difficult to achieve democracy, because we are not suited to democracy. But remember: "a genuinely democratic system of God," the high moral requirements that it can not really appear in the history of mankind. Since the pseudo-democracy, it is difficult to achieve, for us, and violence, the government simply can not control our great country, and then back to the feudal society already impossible, then we can only find ways to help our people to improve awareness of participation in politics. gradually tightening control of the government to change the current government, let it become a truly elite politics. According to Rousseau's view, the frontier of the country, the more impossible to democracy. (However, we can see the North American continent, rely on the federal system is rigidly across this problem, their so-called democracy) the complexity of China's internal contradictions is beyond our imagination, the one hand, we have to rely on the elite system, reduce the authoritarian opportunities; on the one hand but also to reduce the central government for local control, the elite decision-making can be smooth. As a result, the National People's Congress Committee will not be able to do the the vase political spokesmen, but should serve as the core of the People's Republic began to represent the people to truly exercise their rights. The emergence of the elite is necessary and now it seems to rely on the people's representative system. For the latter, we will have a substantial abatement of local institutions, intermediate government, big government become streamline powerful, fast; not a snowball snowballing weight of the people out of breath: People could not afford the that part of all to be cut off. In my opinion, it is theoretically possible a trigger large-scale unrest continue to maintain our society.

Fortunately, we also never be truly free, we may also rely on the improvement of government to get it; if we have a similar free and democratic society, we only have to destroy this government to regain. I'd Ah Q, I hope we are not in the latter premise.